Skip to calculator

Health and nutrition · Energy and calories

Estimate daily calorie needs

Three steps: Mifflin-St Jeor resting burn, times a lump activity factor, then a goal offset. The result is an estimate, not a diet.

Calculate

Current body mass in kilograms, not a goal weight. Convert pounds on the weight converter (1 lb = 0.45359237 kg).

Standing height in centimeters, without shoes. 5 ft 6 in is about 168 cm; use the length converter if you start from feet and inches.

Age in whole years. The equation is not calibrated for children.

Mifflin-St Jeor uses a binary female/male coefficient from the 1990 study. It is not a description of identity.

A Harris-Benedict-style lump factor (1.2 to 1.9), not a PAL measured on your week. If unsure, pick the rung below.

Fixed calorie offsets chosen for this tool, not a clinical prescription. A large deficit is not the default goal.

How the calculator works

You enter weight, height, age, the binary sex used by the formula, an activity rung, and a goal. The tool first estimates resting energy with Mifflin-St Jeor (1990), the resting equation HexaCalc uses as its default. It then multiplies by a factor between 1.2 and 1.9. Those factors are practical Harris-Benedict-style multipliers; they are not the individual PALs in the FAO/WHO/UNU 2004 report, which we cite as a frame for human energy needs, not as the source of 1.2–1.9. Finally a fixed offset is added or subtracted. If the total falls under 1,200 kcal, the display is clamped to 1,200 kcal: that is an interface floor, not a medically validated minimum for you.

Formula and method

Femme : MB = 10 × poids(kg) + 6,25 × taille(cm) − 5 × âge + (−161)

Mifflin-St Jeor 1990, estimated resting energy expenditure. US decimals: 6.25 kcal per cm.

Homme : MB = 10 × poids(kg) + 6,25 × taille(cm) − 5 × âge + 5

Same paper, different constant.

TDEE ≈ MB × facteur d’activité (1,2 / 1,375 / 1,55 / 1,725 / 1,9)

Lump factors, not a measurement of your actual week.

Target = max(1,200 ; TDEE + offset)  with offset ∈ {0, −300, −500, +250, +400}

Tool offsets. The 1,200 kcal floor is not a clinical recommendation.

Mifflin, St Jeor et al. published a predictive equation for resting energy in healthy adults in 1990. We use it as the first brick, a common public estimator, while noting that lab REE and strict BMR are not identical. The activity factor does not come from an accelerometer or a food log: it is one of five rungs. The goal offsets (−300, −500, +250, +400) are HexaCalc design choices, not constants from Mifflin or FAO/WHO/UNU. A food deficit does not become linear fat loss; water, glycogen, and expenditure adaptation play. Linked food pages (roast chicken, cooked rice, apple) illustrate portions; they do not turn this calculator into a meal plan. Enter kg and cm; convert lb and ft/in first if needed.

Worked example

Woman, 68 kg (about 150 lb), 168 cm (about 5 ft 6 in), 38, lightly active, mild loss

Female, 68 kg, 168 cm, 38 years, factor 1.375, offset −300 kcal.

  1. Mifflin BMR = 10 × 68 + 6.25 × 168 − 5 × 38 − 161 = 680 + 1,050 − 190 − 161 = 1,379 kcal/day.
  2. TDEE = 1,379 × 1.375 = 1,896 kcal/day (displayed to the nearest kcal).
  3. Goal = 1,896 − 300 = 1,596 kcal/day, above the 1,200 floor.

About 1,596 kcal/day shown as the goal, for an estimated TDEE of 1,896 kcal/day.

When the 1,200 kcal floor applies

Woman, 50 kg, 155 cm, 25 years, sedentary, “loss” (−500 kcal).

  1. Mifflin BMR = 10 × 50 + 6.25 × 155 − 5 × 25 − 161 = 1,183 kcal/day.
  2. TDEE = 1,183 × 1.2 ≈ 1,419 kcal/day.
  3. TDEE − 500 ≈ 919 kcal/day, below 1,200: the tool shows 1,200 kcal/day and a warning.

1,200 kcal/day displayed. That does not make this level appropriate: a large deficit needs professional follow-up.

Input notes

Weight
Weight enters Mifflin linearly (10 kcal per kg). A morning scale weight is enough; the tool does not separate fat mass. Convert pounds before typing.
Height
Height enters at 6.25 kcal per centimeter. A 2 cm error moves BMR by about 12.5 kcal. Measure standing, without shoes.
Age
Age lowers the estimate (5 kcal per year). The accepted range starts at 15 so an adult equation is not applied to a young child.
Sex
The +5 / −161 term is not a clinical judgment: it is the 1990 equation constant from the study’s male/female groups.
Activity level
Only five rungs. “Moderately active” is not “I walked 8,000 steps” measured. Desk work plus two weekly sessions is often closer to light than to active.
Goal
Maintain copies TDEE. Other rungs apply a fixed delta, the same at 50 kg or 100 kg — another deliberate limit of the tool.

Assumptions and limits

Assumptions

  • Adult whose profile is closer to resting-equation populations (healthy people, not a clinical protocol).
  • The activity factor describes an average lifestyle, not yesterday’s workout.
  • The goal offset is a lump amount, independent of weight.
  • The 1,200 kcal floor is a display rule of the tool.

Limits

  • No calorimetry, no lean mass, no hormones, no medications.
  • Unsuitable in pregnancy, breastfeeding, malnutrition, and many endocrine diseases.
  • A very muscular athlete or a person with limited mobility can sit far from Mifflin × factor.
  • The 1.2–1.9 values are not the tabulated FAO/WHO/UNU 2004 PALs.
  • No food is prescribed: chicken, rice, and apple links are illustrations.

How to read the result

Read the result as an order of magnitude for planning, not a target to hit to the last kilocalorie. TDEE shown next to the goal is the base before the offset. If the 1,200 kcal warning appears, the raw math was lower: that is not a green light for an aggressive deficit. For expenditure without a goal, open TDEE; for rest only, BMR; to split energy, macros.

Common mistakes

  • Picking the highest activity rung “to get more calories.”

    A rung too high inflates TDEE. If unsure, step down and watch weight over several weeks rather than inventing an athlete’s day.

  • Believing a 500 kcal deficit loses 0.5 kg (about 1 lb) of fat per week.

    That is a napkin rule, not physiology. The scale mixes water, gut contents, and tissue. We do not draw a loss curve.

  • Using the 1,200 kcal floor as a “safe” diet.

    The floor only stops an even lower display. It does not say 1,200 kcal fits your size, health, or sport.

  • Recalculating every day from the scale.

    Daily weight wiggles. A weekly recalc, or after a real lifestyle change, is enough for this estimator.

Comparison

Activity factors on this tool (lump, Harris-Benedict style)
RungFactorHonest reading
Sedentary1.2Daily life without counting exercise as training
Lightly active1.375Some activity, far from a high training volume
Moderately active1.55Regular activity, still a lump rung
Active1.725Physically heavy days — often overstated for desk jobs
Very active1.9Reserved for a very high volume; not a measured PAL

Methodology · Sources

Related calculations

Frequently asked questions

Which formula does the calorie calculator use?

Mifflin-St Jeor (1990) for rest, then an activity factor 1.2–1.9, then a goal offset.

Resting metabolism follows Mifflin, St Jeor et al. 1990. Total expenditure is that figure times a lump coefficient. The goal adds or subtracts 0, 300, 500, 250, or 400 kcal. FAO/WHO/UNU 2004 is cited as a frame for human energy needs, not as the source of 1.2–1.9.

Is the activity factor a measured PAL?

No. These are five practical coefficients, not an individual measurement.

A PAL in FAO/WHO/UNU work is built from activities and durations. Here you pick a label. Two “moderately active” people can expend very different amounts. Treat the result as a mental range, not a prescription.

Why a 1,200 kcal floor?

To avoid showing an even lower goal produced by a lump deficit on an already low TDEE.

If TDEE + offset < 1,200, the screen shows 1,200 kcal and a warning. That threshold is not from Mifflin 1990. It does not guarantee nutrient coverage or clinical fit. A large deficit belongs with professional follow-up.

Can I use this during pregnancy?

No: the equation and goal offsets are not a prenatal tool.

Energy needs change in pregnancy and breastfeeding, and Mifflin 1990 covers healthy adults outside that setting. Do not use this calculator to “eat for two” or to run a deficit. Ask for care suited to that situation.

How is this different from the TDEE calculator?

TDEE stops at BMR × activity. Here a goal and a 1,200 kcal floor are added.

Both share Mifflin and the same factors. The calories page is for a planning offset. The TDEE page is expenditure without a delta. BMR isolates rest and compares Harris-Benedict 1984.

Author and update

Written by Rédaction HexaCalc (editorial team). Content last updated: August 25, 2026. No third-party medical or financial review is claimed.

Split these calories

Once you have an order of magnitude, you can split it into protein, carbohydrate, and fat — planning templates, not a prescription.

Open the macro calculator

HexaCalc calorie calculator: an energy-need estimate, not a weight-loss program and not medical advice. Figures on this page are estimates from published formulas, not a diagnosis, not medical advice, and not a personalized eating plan. They do not replace a visit with a clinician. The tool is not designed for children, pregnancy, breastfeeding, eating disorders, or many illnesses and medications. If you are unsure, ask a health professional.

Category: Health and nutrition