Skip to calculator

Health and nutrition · Sport and hydration

Estimate protein grams from body weight

Three coefficients per kilogram: the EFSA PRI 0.83 g/kg for a healthy adult, 1.2 g/kg as an internal “active” rung, 1.6 g/kg as an example in the middle of the 1.4–2.0 g/kg range often cited for training (ISSN 2017).

Calculate

Total body weight in kg. The tool does not have lean mass. Convert lb on the weight converter.

0.83 is a PRI. 1.2 and 1.6 are example coefficients, not prescriptions.

How the calculator works

The math is a multiplication: grams = weight × coefficient. The first rung takes the EFSA (2012) Population Reference Intake: 0.83 g of protein per kg body weight per day for adults, in the opinion on dietary reference values. That is close to the US RDA of 0.8 g/kg, but this tool uses 0.83, not the RDA. The “active” rung uses 1.2 g/kg: not an EFSA PRI, an intermediate tool rung between the PRI and sports ranges. The “strength” rung uses 1.6 g/kg as a midpoint of the 1.4–2.0 g/kg interval discussed in the ISSN 2017 position stand on protein and exercise — not “the” ISSN dose, and not the top of the range (2.0). Matching energy assumes 4 kcal/g.

Formula and method

protéines (g/j) = poids(kg) × {0,83 | 1,2 | 1,6}

One coefficient, by rung. No age or sex correction.

kcal issues des protéines = grammes × 4

Energy equivalent, not a full calorie budget.

EFSA sets a PRI of 0.83 g/kg/day for healthy adults, distinct from a body-composition goal. ISSN discusses higher intakes in people who train, often summarized as 1.4 to 2.0 g/kg/day in that position stand. We do not pull other figures from those texts (no “2.2 g/kg,” no peri-workout timing). 1.6 g/kg is a teaching example in the center of 1.4–2.0. 1.2 g/kg is claimed as neither EFSA nor ISSN. Kidney or liver disease, or a medical high-protein diet, have no place on this form.

Worked example

72 kg (about 159 lb), three rungs

Weight 72 kg.

  1. Sedentary: 72 × 0.83 = 59.76 g/day (≈ 239 kcal from protein).
  2. Active: 72 × 1.2 = 86.4 g/day.
  3. Strength: 72 × 1.6 = 115.2 g/day.

From ≈ 60 g/day (PRI) to ≈ 115 g/day (1.6 g/kg example) for the same weight, depending on the rung — not three simultaneous “true needs.”

Input notes

Weight
The EFSA PRI is expressed per kg of body weight. A very high BMI or sarcopenic obesity makes this denominator debatable; the tool does not adjust.
Reference
The “strength” label does not check that you lift. It is the 1.6 g/kg rung, an example.

Assumptions and limits

Assumptions

  • Weight = total mass on the scale.
  • Dietary protein of “normal” digestibility in the sense of the reference opinions, without a DIAAS adjustment.
  • Rung chosen by you, not inferred from a training questionnaire.

Limits

  • No lean mass, age, or sex in the calculation.
  • 1.2 g/kg is not an EFSA or ISSN figure.
  • 1.6 g/kg does not exhaust the 1.4–2.0 range.
  • Does not say how to spread intakes through the day.
  • Medical contraindications are not screened.

How to read the result

The 0.83 g/kg PRI is a population reference to avoid inadequacy in healthy adults, not an athletic ceiling. Moving to 1.6 g/kg in the tool does not “officially” raise your need: it applies an ISSN-range example. Then cross with the calorie budget (calories page): 115 g of protein is already ≈ 460 kcal, which has to fit in the total.

Common mistakes

  • Reading 1.6 g/kg as “ISSN recommends 1.6 for everyone.”

    ISSN discusses a 1.4–2.0 range for exercise. 1.6 is our midpoint example, labeled as such.

  • Using a goal weight instead of current weight.

    PRI and sports g/kg are generally on current weight, sometimes on lean mass in clinic — which we do not have.

  • Stacking PRI + ISSN “to be safe.”

    Rungs are alternatives, not additives. 0.83 + 1.6 has no meaning.

Comparison

Coefficients on this page
Rungg/kg/dayHonest status
Sedentary0.83Adult PRI, EFSA 2012 opinion (close to, not identical with, the US 0.8 g/kg RDA)
Active1.2Tool choice, between PRI and sports ranges — not a cited standard as such
Strength1.6Example in the middle of 1.4–2.0 g/kg (ISSN 2017), not the top of the range

Methodology · Sources

Related calculations

Frequently asked questions

Is 0.83 g/kg a sports minimum?

No. It is the EFSA PRI for a healthy adult, not a training target.

The Population Reference Intake aims to cover nearly all of the healthy adult population per the 2012 opinion. People who train often aim higher; that is discussed in other texts, including the ISSN position stand, without making 0.83 obsolete as a population safety floor. The US RDA is 0.8 g/kg; this engine uses 0.83.

Why 1.6 and not 2.0 g/kg?

Because 1.6 is a central example in 1.4–2.0, not the top of the range.

Defaulting to 2.0 would have looked like a single target. ISSN talks about an interval. You can aim at another point by multiplying yourself; the tool offers only three rungs to stay readable.

Should I use lean mass?

This tool does not: it only has total weight.

Some clinical protocols report protein per lean mass. Without DXA or a validated impedance measurement here, we do not. Inventing lean mass from BMI would be false precision.

Is a high intake dangerous?

This calculator does not decide. In kidney disease or other illness, medical advice comes first.

We do not invent a toxic threshold. We also do not claim “you cannot eat too much protein.” Outside good health, do not treat 1.6 g/kg as permission.

Author and update

Written by Rédaction HexaCalc (editorial team). Content last updated: August 25, 2026. No third-party medical or financial review is claimed.

Back to the calorie budget

Protein grams occupy part of kcal. To fit those grams in a 4/4/9 total, open macros; for the total itself, calories or TDEE.

Split a calorie total

Displayed grams apply a coefficient to your weight (EFSA PRI or sports examples). Not a clinical dose and not a lifting plan. Figures on this page are estimates from published formulas, not a diagnosis, not medical advice, and not a personalized eating plan. They do not replace a visit with a clinician. The tool is not designed for children, pregnancy, breastfeeding, eating disorders, or many illnesses and medications. If you are unsure, ask a health professional.

Category: Health and nutrition